16-369 The reason for expediency…
Salvation of Saviors
16_series 369
We all run after miracles,
But there’s nothing more wonderful
Than that place beneath the sky,
where the roof of your Home is…
All of us, now living, are extremely fortunate to be participants in this historic moment when the true conditions of our normal existence are being restored on our planet. We are eye witnessing extremely large-scale, in their depth and essence, time and space, and complexity and pinpoint accuracy, PROCESSES of REAL TRANSFORMATION of both the environment of our life support, and of ourselves, - which are taking place in their core without our proper understanding of it yet. All this is BEYOND OUR CAPABILITIES to influence what is happening. This should be taken as a given, without jumping to conclusions, or even relying on information, which flows out in an endless stream, and is incredibly difficult to make sense of, should anyone want to. Even those who consider themselves "knowledgeable, understanding and “chosen." This is an exceedingly difficult period, a time of changes in everything that we are used to and have learned, that we can do and aspire to, that we have dreamed of and planned for. Everything is changing, but it is not some kind of apocalypse. Man is provided with caring and powerful support, but not in the sense of receiving manna from heaven. We have already begun, and we will still have to overcome many difficulties, to REDISCOVER the true, entirely different World, to acquire new technologies of a higher level and order, and re-develop our native Earth under completely different environmental conditions. Look at those floods, hurricanes, temperature changes, unusual phenomena in the atmosphere, fires of vast territories, the rampant so-called "Virus" spreading around the world - this is the confirmation of what I am writing about. There can be no instructions for actions here. All elements of initiative must be welcomed. But the main thing, in my opinion, is still PEOPLE’S QUEST FOR knowledge and understanding, even though for some reason the most real is always the furthest away. And the very reality of nowadays, the realm to which pure existence, expediency and understanding belong, is so different from human concepts and reflections that it will neither resonate nor cooperate with them, but applies them to its own advantage. Expediency operates through causality. Hence the serene, even careless calm with which people inventory the rickety wealth of their knowledge and understanding. Let only human things be discerned by the human mind today; there is no misfortune or limitation in that. The other, the high, the abstract, WILL NOT MANIFEST ITSELF otherwise than as it is hidden in the ordinary. It is necessary to look into the familiar to see how it is applied by permanent forms to their purposes, and even more so today, in this cycle of the great number of events that are taking place around us and before our eyes. The world in its entirety would be unraveled and understood - if cause and effect were made clear. But they are not and NEVER WILL BE. Out of the clarity of this darkness grows a final understanding, that is full of inexplicable interest. So, too, is the contrast between causal and purposive explanations. The purpose does not supersede the cause, but simply stands beside it as a lord from another world. In expediency we are presented with the remarkable phenomenon of the domination of nothingness over being, of that which does not yet exist, over that which exists or is being accomplished. And we should not, therefore, be complacent when we encounter the primitive scheme that expedient action exists first in the mind. Be assured: “practical action” does not exist in advance at all in any sphere of the intellectual world available to us and is comprehended only retroactively, not from the very beginning oriented to some predetermined conception of expediency.
The purpose of purposes is not in the concept, but IN BEING ITSELF, which for our vision is not distinct from non-being (nothingness) and is not reduced to the potential existence of purpose in the mind. In the end, the phenomena of expediency have, as it seems, a form of existence that is eternally real. They are hidden from us precisely by their eternal reality. Precisely because they always already exist in advance, already possess an unconditional existence, needing nothing else - this is why they paradoxically remain for us in non-existence and turn out to be a goal. But this, in my opinion, is the dark side of the question, which requires the most precise research and effort in thinking. the main non-existence to be fulfilled remains something eternally present, which is more and more acute today in all that is going on around us and in all that gives us the opportunity to know why we are in the position we are in today, and what has been happening on our earth for the past 18,000 years, and most importantly, what it could lead to if we would HAVE realized it! I do not feel like softening the edges of what has happened or is happening today. I do want the information that is given in these 369 series articles to change the very essence of your understanding, requiring more and more attention and comprehension of the information. That, in my view, is the most important goal.
Today, most people take an arbitrarily chosen statement they like and from it they derive their truths, which constitute the pattern of life. Why don’t people ever ask themselves what the statement they liked has grown out of, that they have elevated to the status of absolute truth? I suppose they subconsciously DO NOT WANT to know the parents of their truth out of some unknown fear that they won’t like the parents. And the truth they produced will suddenly start swaying. And Man does not want his truths to be swayed. Any threat to what is settled and accepted as a matter of fact, people take as a threat to life. That is why they are NOT INCLINED to examine their "platitudes", which are mostly derived from the past. People are determined to defend their only reference points. To lose them is like going blind. That is why people, especially nowadays, react negatively to unfamiliar information. Those who want to understand, and NOT just accept in belief, seek to get to the very original reference point of all their truths. I see this point as the pursuit of goodness in the full meaning of the word. It helps to understand the true intentions of people and not to deceive or be deceived myself.
To make the world a better place, we must understand human nature as it is, and not as moralizers portray it. They ascribe to Man qualities that he cannot have by virtue of the order of things. People strive to conform to these qualities, but since it is impossible to go against nature, they have no choice but to be hypocritical. This, too, is in pursuit of the good. But if hypocrisy brings good to us, WE ARE CROOKED in SPIRIT, so I'm still inclined to believe that tying ourselves to the past is a sign of limitation, for the most part. Traditions in modern society are "developed" to create this attachment - for example, it is considered bad not to visit burial sites to honor the dead, it is important to celebrate cycles of events – births, a huge number of holidays and anniversaries like years lived together, the memorial activities commemorating years of life together - placing plaques, monuments, and publishing notices "in memory of ...", it is honorable to dig out and specify certain details of some past events without knowing the actual reality. Sincerely condemned or at least met with misunderstanding, cause restrained aversion to any direct deviation from the above - the violation of traditions in one way or another is associated with the violation of the stability of existence, hence the aversion to violate them. There are not any adequate and unemotional reasons for this. “Without the past there is no future” may just as well be attributed to a clichéd idea as the tradition of arranging cemeteries exactly in the way they are arranged now, for example, in Siberia. Yet in Europe it is done differently. In India, they also have their own traditions. Clichés may be different in scale and pattern, but they are still rules that people do not understand, they simply follow them, because otherwise there is either uncertainty and instability, or censure, which can also make them insecure and unstable. Or they don't follow them, but then they don't announce it, in order not to run into condemnation, the constant pressure of which is also insecurity and instability. However, man is a singular construction, while humanity is a multitude. The comfortable existence of a multitude of different "units" is stability, which everyone wants, but within the framework of the PREVIOUS IMPOSED CONTROL. This is why many of those who are guided by what is happening have questions - when will this transitional period end, when will it get easier, when and who or through what will relieve this burden?… Take your time and think about it, and the answer WILL COME to you. NEVER. Why do we need a fixed, self-sufficient, non-developing structure? Such a construct, as we know it, is the Ebrs’ "civilization". “People have tried it on” - the failures of this option are obvious. This means it is necessary to look for another way – one that is not perceived by today’s multitude of human units, because it is impossible due to the inconsistency of the attitudes present in consciousness.
And when they began to be changed from the outside, we, every human unit of the existing multitude, began to creak and groan, slowly swaying, pulling (using the entire arsenal of possibilities and intellect) our traditions to the new settings, clinging to them and changing them at the same time to keep up with the given vector. In this respect, I consider what I write in my articles and books, to be constructions that facilitate and accelerate the "breakdown" that takes place in people.
I try to encourage the readers, to make their Brains change faster and more perfectly, but these changes require me to constantly increase the depth and scope of what I write and provide as information that is either understood by downplaying it, or not accepted and therefore rejected.
If you take my current reader and give him my works from 7-8 years ago, he will already be somewhat perplexed by the 7-8 year old sample written for him, then, 7-8 years ago. And then what, surrender ourselves to traditions and generally accepted norms? How to correlate the postulates of the eternity of some immutable truths to what is happening, in which one's own beliefs are broken, changed and perfected daily? But nevertheless, in everyday terms, the human oneness and the human multitude are reality, and they need to somehow be reconciled and combined, and this is possible only for those who think in the realities of what is happening (right or wrong - it does not matter, the main thing is that they think). Therefore, even if I am convinced, for example, that using a medical mask is nonsense, I will still wear it out of respect for those who consider it nonsense not to use it under the current circumstances. If I am convinced of something that others DO NOT ACCEPT, I will still respect them, because I respect their own beliefs, even if they are different from mine, but at least they are there. Moreover, on a different scale of perception, everyone is mistaken.
In many of my works I propose in my reasoning and diagrams to rely strictly on the foundation built from blocks of information of the programmed improvement of Brain genotypes under the control of the Ebrs’ system. However, as I am becoming convinced, this base is too imperfect and unreliable (for many), if only because, like similar foundation blocks for the worldview of the now dying civilization, it is too rigidly fixed and limited. No matter how hard we try, IT DOES NOT BECOME the foundation upon which the reader can reliably build something. It is itself a superstructure. The basis for most readers is perceived, as I understand it, to be something else, some kind of arrangement that allowed these Ebrs’ plans to materialize (as we know - not completely) and "launch" what is now happening in all its magnitude. But no matter how you spin it, some of the information that I give for reflection, the reader is forced to take as a given. This is probably very comfortable for some and not for others. We, each of us, look at what is happening from our own place, and I never cease to be amazed that there are people who readily replace the old religious foundation, atheistic, or any other - with a new one similar in structure, just with different characters. Well, probably, this is still a step forward (or at least it is tearing your butt off of the couch), but is that enough? Any gaps in the understanding of what is going on are filled in by saying “so it was programmatically determined” - without unfolding on the basis of such capabilities, with the use of some constructions by which it was implemented. Any “edible” explanation for the current society (and its individual representative) should be based on some OLD BASIS OF UNDERSTANDING of reality due to the absence of other ones, otherwise this explanation SIMPLY IS NOT CONSIDERED. I still try to “pull out” from the conceptual apparatus of a modern intellectually rather developed person (but, unfortunately, there are not that many of them) separate constructions and tie them to the new system of the worldview and their type of thinking. This at least leads to a broadening of the understanding and outlook of anyone who reads what is offered to him. It doesn't matter whether or not he agrees with what is presented. Any result of familiarization broadens the scope of understanding. And then definitions fade into the background - only understanding remains. Any single or cumulative current fact can be easily adjusted to one’s own frame of mind, or simply rejected. The process of comparing one’s own understanding or way of thinking with someone else’s will irreversibly change the original way of thinking or understanding. Even if what is offered for some reason is rejected. Only what cannot be touched upon – that is, what will not be said - will not change. Proving and trying to convey something to someone who DOES NOT WANT IT seems like a complete waste of effort and time - but just getting acquainted with it, even with a categorical rejection, I am SURE of it, will somewhat change the framework of thinking, making your Brain work a little differently - even if they say "complete nonsense" out loud - the seed is already ! planted - and after a while it will grow under the external influence. In my opinion, this is roughly how “transmission” works - it is perceived and deciphered by everyone according to the capabilities of the Brain and their own background. It is good if all this is combined in harmony, and if it is not, it just takes time and, most importantly, a state of searching. For example, in my previous articles I deliberately described mentality as having a kind of volume, but for many it is a "murky concept."
I made an attempt to describe it according to the mind and understanding of every reader. Surely, all related constructs of understanding have expanded - but everyone who read it, I’m sure, has definitely changed significantly in their thinking, even if they DID NOT AGREE with what they read. Am I entitled to hope that someone will understand it, take it as realizable and begin to act on the information given, even if it is not stated directly, but is led to it indirectly? After all, it is only operable by its creators.
And how many individuals in today’s society are there who, even if they don’t understand it, at least CARE to read it, this information, to make sense of it? And is it possible to share a goal, an idea with someone in this way? I do not think so. But it is possible to bring the consciousness and way of thinking to a state in which the goal can be perceived or generated, born, lowered to the level of the active consciousness (and consciousness uplifted to the required level) of someone who is now reading and either does not understand, or does not accept, or rebels when trying to make sense of this tangle of approaches to human nature, consciousness, and mind, which are tied to the concept of mentality. However, an additional and indispensable bonus of digging through this mess is that it leads to the important conclusion that the fabrications of even the most respected and venerable scientists in any field of science (scientific knowledge) are extremely limited in most cases. And those who are less limited can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And it turns out that there is NO ONE to lean on, so the only way out is for each person to sort out the information and look for one’s own answers.
Nowadays, the quantity of available information allows a person to comprehend for himself the unknown by which his mind is motivated. The quantity and quality of vital information is concluded between the level of one’s own available knowledge and the capacity of the mind to grow in adequate understanding. The level of the mind's ability to grow is directly proportional to the amount of information already invested in the mind. That is, the more one knows, the more one wants to know. The framework of adequate understanding is what does not allow the mind to fantasize and, of course, lie, within its own particular mentality (the genotype of the Brain).
The parasitic way of life, conveyed to us in school lessons in classes of natural history and biology through pictures of bio-variants about the fate of mushrooms, roundworms and various “riders”, flies and other things, unambiguously and deeply ingrains in us NOT ONLY viciousness and some unfairness of such a life arrangement, but also the strictly one-sidedly marked nature of this multifaceted and ambiguous phenomenon in a less superficial attitude.
Nowadays, the quantity of available information allows a person to comprehend for himself the unknown by which his mind is motivated. The quantity and quality of vital information is concluded between the level of one’s own available knowledge and the capacity of the mind to grow in adequate understanding. The level of the mind's ability to grow is directly proportional to the amount of information already invested in the mind. That is, the more one knows, the more one wants to know. The framework of adequate understanding is what does not allow the mind to fantasize and, of course, lie, within its own particular mentality (the genotype of the Brain).
The parasitic way of life, conveyed to us in school lessons in classes of natural history and biology through pictures of bio-variants about the fate of mushrooms, roundworms and various “riders”, flies and other things, unambiguously and deeply ingrains in us NOT ONLY viciousness and some unfairness of such a life arrangement, but also the strictly one-sidedly marked nature of this multifaceted and ambiguous phenomenon in a less superficial attitude.
As a little impetus towards the broadening of ideas in this area, we can consider and try to comprehend the possibility of implementation of parasitic development (development at the expense of others), parasitic nutrition (nutrition at the expense of other organisms, that is, to their detriment), parasitic recovery (restoration of “the shirt" using, for example, the potential of another Brain) - and the like, no less absurdly unambiguous and as if perceived exactly as it was taught by the older fellows such as parents, tutors, teachers and so on. And when you start thinking in this direction, try to avoid thinking in terms of the understanding as that the student is grateful to the teacher, and the teacher has a need to pass on knowledge, and, therefore, it is no longer a kind of parasitism; that the healer/doctor/practitioner is devoted to his profession and for him his life's work is to restore lost health; that the existing food chains are a closed cycle, and if to look in perspective, consumption of a living creature for sustenance is a certain fundamental basis of life, and therefore, as a priori, it is fine and CANNOT BE attributed to parasitism – then one can successfully, thoroughly and provably separate harsh and unprincipled parasitism from a certain vital need - well, otherwise it is simply impossible, one should eat something in order not to die ... and in general, for infringement on something sacred - "... you can get punched in the neck." This example is our thinking in the so-called “binary system of thinking”, which is discussed in detail in the book by Nicolai Levashov “The Final Appeal to Mankind”.
“The basis of the severely distorted personality is the concept of “YES” and “NO”, as if they were real and manifested many times in the multistage analysis of any complex process. For all that, the number of levels in the analysis is usually very small, even if the problem you are analyzing is quite complicated. The search for a solution comes down to choosing one out of two possibilities where two possible solutions exist, whereas the most correct solution lies somewhere in between."
Without aggravating a delicate problem, which is somehow covered by a rather unsuccessful disguise, it is enough FOR YOURSELF TO TOUCH the indicated aspects of your own existence - but not to reproach yourself for explicit or implicit parasitism (although not forbidden - in fact, it turns out to be an entertaining and developing occupation) regarding them completely as if innocent "donors", but in order to realize this phenomenon as integral and multifaceted - if a parasite does not have a "donor", then all this complexity and multifacetedness will begin to fall apart, at the same time forming from its own remains and debris a variety of simplified parasitic structures until the stage of the final completion of their fading-dying functioning – on the condition of the complete cessation of the external control of the old CS and overcoming the auto-motor-like thinking, which it nevertheless left in us. And with the current process of the change of control within the framework of the new (native) CS, all participants of the former functional-constructive organization will be reshuffled, sifted out, and, after some rearranging in line with other functional-targeted endowments, will form some other structures, which we observe today and TRY TO COMPREHEND. The painfulness of such a process is determined by the complete misunderstanding and a lack of awareness by its participants of what is going on because of their own primitive and severely distorted organization - for someone who has always taken, it is extremely difficult even to think that it is possible not to take and to give instead. To the one who has always given, the possibility of taking something seems unbelievable. This is in a primitive version for a rough idea of the enormity of the problem. Again, these are examples unencumbered by the complexities of life. An American, living happily on the dole is hard pressed to believe that he or she has an unreasonable need to engage in any activity. It would be even more difficult to explain to an overworked single mother with two children that she should stop slaving for her boss and find something to do that would please her soul. But the point, in general, should be clear and understandable - if a certain control scheme was organized on a planetary scale, the change of that control scheme IMMEDIATELY NOT only affects, but is accomplished through a fundamental transformation of each controllable element. Every single one! Accepting, as a simplification, that the control on a parasitic basis is being changed (in our understanding) by some other, we, as elements of this very parasitic construction, can very limitedly make an assumption about some OTHER STRUCTURE and the principles of its construction. But even in this case, our ideas and fantasies will be built according to the old "parasitic" scheme. We are doomed, according to the characteristics of our Brain and consciousness, to use what has been given. It is so unambiguously limited that any option beyond it, including one that is profoundly true in its own direction, will certainly be perceived as "wrong, delusional, and crazy" - and perceived negatively, implicitly or explicitly - it will cause the REJECTION BY THE ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, which will affect at least it being ignored, and more often create outright censure based on misunderstanding.
Today analyzing my life path, and exactly in the paradigm that I outlined above, back in 1993-1994, after the signing of the "The Agreement on Public Accord “ (1994), by which – not many people know about it now - we still live today, I realized then that I would live in a disgusting country with a very disadvantaged population, a monstrous elite and more than strange political parties that would babble about how they represent the interests of the people. I realized then that it was all going to be monstrously bad. And in that monstrously bad environment I would have to live, because I CANNOT LIVE OUTSIDE of RUSSIA, and Russia is what it is.
And I realized even more - I would have to protect this, because all this could collapse overnight. It was very easy to bring down the state at that time. Then, no doubt, troops would invade the territory of Russia, American helicopters would fly in, and everything would become completely fatal. So, it became necessary to live with this monstrous disadvantage. That was a fateful necessity. It would be necessary to love and protect the circumstances, and to somehow exist in it, and it is possible to exist as a whole, WITHOUT LOSING our human dignity and values. And in doing so, my understanding gave me an impression of everything that was going on. I DID NOT HAVE the information then that I have now, and I was thinking within the framework of what I wrote above. And when some very pompous groups start to shout about how “life in Russia is disgusting,” I can only say one thing: it is even more disgusting than you shout, but only I have known about that for a long time. And if anything surprises me, and gives me hope, it is that IT is NOT AS repulsive as it could have been, because of the events that happened after 2011.04.24. And what has happened is that the Earth is coming into its controlled states of natural existence after the change of the Control Systemic power and is freeing itself from the dependance upon the previous external interventionist control, bringing itself and its programmed states of harmony of development into its true nature, embodying rehabilitation into the previous states of the general programmed event chronoprocess at a HIGH tempo, and most importantly - bringing all true and native Control Complexes into their effective controlling natural (physical) nature. And all this is happening today before our eyes within the Transition Period, and not at some point in the distant future! No bureaucratic decisions of any former powerful level of people from the Constructs of the former controlled existence are required for this. They are all free from the "human concern for their own being." It is NO longer NECESSARY, nor will it be possible, to operate through violence and parasitism. Gone is that time of "interventionist support" in the executive actions of human society. But what has remained is a structure built within the framework of what was conceived in the past - the State. Many people think - the State is everyone’s business. But the modern so-called elite is ready to adapt to any state - strong, weak, rising, deteriorating, sovereign, colonial, socialist, liberal, nationalist - just to get their own. Giving is not for the elite. But to take, to take away, to appropriate, to takeover. These cynics do not build the state, but they can use it effectively - in their own interests. This means that something else is needed - something that will replace the state as we understand it today and ensure the activity and residence of people on the territory that we now call a State. But the cynics and today's elite are not fit to create such a thing. They are active only when it comes to something personal, something individual. And the construction of the New (no matter what it will be called) requires everyone’s cooperation. This can be ensured only within the framework of the New "Social Agreement", and within the framework of this agreement, to define this New, that will become an idea, an ideology, a goal - like passion, like creativity, like the highest value. And for such an idea, an appropriate elite is needed, for the creation of this new world. Ideology of such an elite can be neither classical communism, nor liberalism, nor capitalism. So, it is necessary to think in a different direction, to look for examples not in the history of Russia and other non-Western and non-modern societies. What is required is HARD WORK OF ANOTHER KIND in its perfection - cognition of a higher level, conscious comprehension and orientation in the development of states and elements of Consciousness and Mind. I do not see any obstacles to this. All this is possible and not so unbelievable. If there is a will - there will be desire and aspiration.
Once again I will repeat a point I have already made more than once. But it is extremely relevant today and requires constant reminding. Life is like a car controlled by a satellite. A person sits in the back seat. He has no idea where he ultimately wants to go.
The car continues on its way, and the man looks around. And one day he sees a cemetery in the distance...
Many people are not satisfied with life in a track. They would like to go where they want to go, not where the road leads. But in order to drive toward your goal, you need to know the purpose of life. Where can a person get that purpose? Accept on faith someone else's speculation or revelations? But if a person does not want to believe anything, if he wants to know, there is nothing left but to figure it out for himself. I hope, really hope that everything that I write will help in this.
Feodor Shkrudnev
August 2, 2021